SESSION I

TIME: Tuesday 9 May, 10:30-12:00

ROOM: California West

TRACK: Ecosystem Restoration

TOPIC: Collaborative Funding, Formulation, and Data

MODERATOR:

 

PRESENTATIONS:

 

 

Title:               Lessons Learned in Public Private Collaboration in the North Atlantic Division

Presenter:       Bill Hubbard, New England District

 

Budget reality and private interest have coalesced in the creation of a new venue to support ecological restoration in the region.  The Corporate Wetlands Restoration Partnership (CWRP) is an innovative private-public initiative aimed at preserving, restoring, enhancing and protecting aquatic habitats. Bringing together corporations, federal and state agencies, non-profit organizations and academia, CWRP allows members to contribute in a fundamental way to crucial projects involving America’s wetland habitats. More than 200 corporate partners have contributed time and money to facilitate projects. Since its 1999 inception, when the Gillette Company partnered with the Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, this venue has generated $3 million in contributions and pledges of in-kind services supporting CWRP goals. This presentation would examine the set-up and operations of the CWRP Public/Private partnership.

 

Seeking to foster positive working relationships among corporations, government agencies, non-profit organizations and communities is one of the primary goals of the CWRP. This unique approach to aquatic habitat enhancement results in the maximum application of government funds for projects. Using corporate contributions, combined with government and other funds, the CWRP contributes vital resources to projects needing funding and support. The ability to leverage federal dollars with contributions makes the CWRP initiative truly unique in restoration, protection, enhancement and preservation efforts.

 

 

Title:               Ballona Creek Ecosystem Restoration Feasibility Study

Presenter:       MaLisa Martin, Los Angeles District

 

Ballona Creek Watershed consists of a170 sq. miles of highly urbanized landscape (80 percent) and many municipalities and will take a comprehensive watershed approach to restore and enhance the creek and remaining wetlands. The study will investigate the feasibility of riparian restoration and soft bottom configuration along the Creek and at with two tributaries, opportunities for water storage in the upper watershed, and restoration options for scarce coastal wetlands and lagoons.

 

The challenging aspects of the study are due to the disparate locations of project units, complex mix of sponsors, and the past 30 years of litigation.  The Creek winds it way through many Cities and the Study like the Creek, involves many sponsors:  City of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles, Culver City, Baldwin Hills Conservancy, Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy, California Coastal Conservancy, and our main sponsor the Santa Monica Bay Restoration Commission.  The benefits have been notable, like despite not getting allocations remotely near our executable budget for FY06, the study is moving along, amazingly, close to schedule.  Additionally the famously litigious stakeholder groups are supportive of our efforts, and we have a large coalition ringing the congressional offices. 

 

Title:               Using Virtual Tours to Evaluate Ecosystem Restoration Alternatives

Presenter:       Camie Knollenberg, Rock Island District

 

Lake Belle View Feasibility Study presented a challenging opportunity to solve a complicated water resource problem while serving a non-traditional sponsor and multiple stakeholders.  The recommended plan allows the community to maintain their lake while achieving the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources’ and Dane County’s goal of restoring flow to the Sugar River, in effect achieving dam removal.  After evaluating the full array of alternative plans, the team identified four “best buy” plans.  To aide the sponsor and stakeholders in selecting a recommended plan, the team used virtual tours of the plans to demonstrate what the various measures would look like and the impact of each plan on the community’s aesthetics.  The tour provided 360-degree before and after views of the best buy plans from six locations in the project area.  This innovative tool proved invaluable at public and stakeholder meetings to convey the design of each plan.

 

 

Title:               Streamlining South Florida CERP Water Quality, Biological, Physical Data Access Using USACE Datanet Web Services

Presenters:     Peter Besrutschko, Jacksonville District; Denise C. Martin, Jacksonville District; James T. Stinson, ERDC; Greg Walker, ERDC; Ken Pathak, ERDC

 

The Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District and ERDC Vicksburg plan to use the DataNet web services based data management system to develop a prototype application for the Everglades Restoration. The prototype will be used to view and process project data which has been collected and stored by other federal, state and local agencies. The DataNet system uses a new technology that is comprised of callable programs or software components called Web Services. The Web Services instantly acquire data now inefficiently and inconsistently accessed from ftp, http, CD, data servers, etc.    The primary benefit of this approach is a considerable time savings to Scientists and Engineers who acquire, reformat, transform, and organize data.  Moreover, data are typically available in disparate formats and structures, unnecessarily complicating  simple retrievals . This may result in needless requests for additional data collection and monitoring, or suboptimal decisions based on partial data.  This prototype would allow most data collected, QA/QCed, and stored by others to be automatically reformatted to a standard, allowing diverse sources to be viewed as if the data resided within a single data set.  For example, water quality data is currently being collected and stored all over the country, by different agencies, with different data structures and standards. 

 

The current plan is to develop the DataNet web services prototype to provide coverage for the entire State of Florida for all NEPA related project data needs. 

 

 


SESSION III

TIME: Tuesday 9 May, 3:30-5:00

ROOM: California West

TRACK: Ecosystem Restoration

TOPIC: Learning From Others, Monitoring and Adapting

MODERATOR:

 

PRESENTATIONS:

 

 

Title:               Collaborative Planning And Science Based Scoping: Chesapeake Marshlands Restoration Project

Presenters:     Steven Kopecky, Baltimore District; Steven Pugh, Baltimore District

 

Over the past five years, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Baltimore District, has been working with the State of Maryland and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to develop a strategy to restore tidal wetlands in the Blackwater NWR and Fishing Bay WMA area. To address this large and complex problem, the planning team developed a three phase approach. The phases included: 1) a small 10 – 15 acre demonstration project, 2) a mid-sized 100 – 200 acre project at Blackwater National Wildlife Refuge, and 3) a landscape-scale effort to restore 1,000s of acres in the Blackwater NWR and Fishing Bay WMA area.

 

Efforts to conduct landscape-scale restoration have received a major boost by being named as a top priority in the Corps' Baltimore Harbor and Channels Dredged Material Management Plan.  As a result, we are currently ramping up to evaluate the feasibility of large scale marsh restoration through the beneficial use of clean dredged material.  A collaborative science based approach will be employed to develop a recommended plan for the restoration of this internationally recognized wetland system. The study team will use lessons learned from the demonstration project, from other projects in the Chesapeake Bay area, and from select projects around the country as a foundation to build from. It is anticipated, that bringing together a broad base of experts from academia; Federal, state and local governments; and the private sector, early on in the development of this study, will result in a better project in the long run.

 

Title:               The Lower Cape May Meadows Coastal Ecosystem Restoration Project

Presenters:     Beth Brandreth, Philadelphia District

 

The Lower Cape May Meadows project is a coastal ecosystem restoration project along the Atlantic coast of New Jersey. The project area is 1.3 miles long and encompasses approximately 340 acres of land owned by The Nature Conservancy and NJDEP. The project area is a very rare coastal freshwater wetland system that boasts huge populations of migrating birds, as well as numerous state and Federally-listed threatened and endangered plants and animals.

 

Designing and implementing a beach restoration project with a primary goal of ecosystem restoration has allowed the addition of habitat features not typically possible in standard beach projects.  The majority of these features were designed to benefit the Federally threatened piping plover.  Since plovers historically nested within the project area, Federal and State agencies worked closely with the Corps to develop habitat features to improve the nesting and feeding habitat available to plovers.  Throughout the construction of the project, the Corps has continued to work closely with the landowners and resource agencies to make applicable project modifications to benefit this species resulting in a highly successful 2005 nesting season.  Intensive collaboration has also taken place regarding the protection of state-listed plant and animal species which occur at the site.

 

Title:               Green River – Monitoring Without Borders

Presenter:       Wm. Michael Turner, Louisville District

 

A 1998 meeting of a small group of scientists and engineers from The Nature Conservancy (TNC) and Louisville District led to a cooperative effort to modify regulation and operation of Green River Lake.  This initial cooperative effort led to the national Sustainable Rivers Project between TNC and USACE.  One of the many challenges in implementing this change in reservoir management is monitoring environmental impacts.  The Corps budgeting process and policies towards monitoring are not generally supportive of monitoring.  Louisville District needed to find partners with common interests in the Green in order to develop a wide-ranging monitoring program downstream of Green River Lake.  Fortunately, additional efforts to benefit and protect Green River were initiated around the same time by National Park Service (NPS), Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS), Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources (KDFWR), TNC and others.  Examples and results of cooperative efforts of many agencies, universities, and non-governmental organizations are presented.

 

In addition to modeling reservoir regulation, the first cost shared environmental restoration project between the Corps of Engineers and The Nature Conservancy was designed and constructed during 1999-2001.  A Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (CREP) sponsored by the NRCS, KDFWR, Kentucky Department of Conservation, and The Nature Conservancy added to the momentum.  Louisville District participates as a team member developing and guiding the USDA funded monitoring program.  Monitoring studies are led by Western Kentucky University. In July 2002, the District joined with Mammoth Cave National Park science staff in development and funding of a NPS research grant proposal for freshwater mussel propagation, rearing and reintroduction program for Green River.  The Tennessee Cooperative Unit of US Geological Survey and KDFWR’s Center for Mollusk Conservation are partners in this effort. The successful documentation of environmental benefits to the Green River from the work of many others led to the District Engineer signing a Finding of No Significant Impact on March 13, 2006, recommending the continuation of the three-year experimental regulation of Green River Lake as the permanent method of operating this multi-purpose reservoir.

 

 

Title:               A Collaborative Approach towards Monitoring and Adaptive Management of Restored Freshwater Tidal Wetlands in the Anacostia River Watershed, Washington, D.C.

Presenters:     Steven B. Pugh, Baltimore District

 

Over the past decade, the Corps of Engineers, in partnership with the District of Columbia and the National Park Service, has restored approximately 100 acres of freshwater tidal wetlands in the Anacostia River.  Projects were constructed in 1993, 2000, 2003 and one is under construction in 2006.

 

In conjunction with these projects, a monitoring and adaptive management strategy was developed to evaluate project success, provide lessons learned and establish a platform to implement additional management measures when necessary to achieve intended goals.

 

To facilitate communication, a wetlands restoration workgroup was established. Each year, results from the monitoring program and other pertinent research were presented to the workgroup. The workgroup was able to use lessons learned from earlier restoration efforts in the development of subsequent projects. In addition, several adaptive management strategies were initiated that have been critical to insure the future of the tidal wetlands in the Anacostia. Some of these strategies have included non-native plant species control, modifications in targeted wetland plant communities, establishment of temporary goose exclosures and the development of a resident goose management plan.

 

By pulling together the resources of multiple Federal and local agencies along with active citizens groups, many obstacles have been overcome and there is a much better opportunity for problems to be solved in the future.

 


SESSION V

TIME: Wednesday 10 May, 3:30-5:00

ROOM: California West

TRACK: Ecosystem Restoration

TOPIC: Challenges in Formulation

MODERATOR:

 

PRESENTATIONS:

 

 

Title:               How Many Fish Equal A Tree? 

Presenter:       Robert L. Browning II, Albuquerque District

 

Economic analysis can evaluate the impacts of constraints in formulating ecosystem restoration projects.  My involvement in the Albuquerque BioPark Sec. 1135 study began with the question, “How many fish equal a tree?”  The thought at the time was there’s a limited supply of water and the team will need to determine an efficient allocation of water for an aquatic habitat and a wetland habitat.  During the course of the study, it was clear that, though fish and trees didn’t have to compete for the same water (the final design provided trees water as a positive externality of watering the aquatic habitat), the economist can add value to the formulation of the NER plan by evaluating the impacts of natural constraints (available acreage, water inflow rates) and policy constraints (available water rights) when developing management measures for a restoration project.

 

This presentation will discuss the development and analysis of management features used to generate an aquatic habitat and three types of wetland habitat, the use of IWR-PLAN and limitations encountered, team involvement challenges and lessons learned.

 

Title:               Everglades Restoration: Incremental Justification of a Comprehensive Plan - Policy Issues and Technical Procedures

Presenter:       Eric Bush, Jacksonville District

 

The Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP) consists of 68 separate components, which have been combined into multiple projects to be implemented over a 40-year implementation period.  The CERP was approved by Congress in the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 as a “framework” for the restoration of the South Florida ecosystem.  WRDA 2000 also established certain project implementation requirements. 

 

The CERP Programmatic Regulations (33 CFR Part 385) enacted in 2003 further established project implementation principles, including the requirement that “(i)ndividual projects shall be formulated, evaluated, and justified based on their ability to contribute to the goals and purposes of the Plan and on their ability to provide benefits that justify costs on a next-added increment basis (emphasis added).  The regulations define the term “next-added increment” as “the next project to be added to a system of projects that includes only those projects that have been approved and likely to have been implemented” and established a requirement that program-wide guidance be developed, including “instructions for formulation and evaluation of alternatives developed for Project Implementation Reports, their cost effectiveness, and impacts,” including the process for evaluating the project as the next-added increment of the CERP.

 

This presentation will describe lessons learned from applying the basic investment concept of “cost justified by benefits” to watershed-scale restoration planning for the Everglades ecosystem, technical procedures that have been developed to satisfy legal requirements and meet standards of public and scientific acceptability, and compliance challenges associated with applying technical procedures to federal and USACE planning policy requirements.

 

Title:               Integration of A Large-Scale General Investigation Ecosystem Restoration Projects Within A Regional Planning Framework

Presenter:       Jeffrey F. Dillon, Seattle District

 

The Puget Sound Nearshore restoration project (PSNER) is a General Investigation Feasibility Study initiated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in 2000.  Its purpose is to restore nearshore health to degraded areas along Washington’s 2,300-mile long Puget Sound coastline.  The Corps along with its local sponsor, the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife, have worked closely to develop an integrated approach to addressing the nearshore needs of Puget Sound.  This presentation will focus on project organization, the regional ecosystem restoration environment and specifically, the inter-agency relationships between scientists, academia, professionals and local partners that provide direction to the project team.  The PSNER Team has been actively engaged in regional salmon recovery efforts, technical document preparation and regional funding programs that help keep the project relevant and program results acceptable to the sponsor.  PSNER’s integration into regional efforts has garnered early success and attention; helping the Corps leverage limited resources and respond to large scale ecosystem damage where ecosystem restoration may rely on a diverse set of solutions operating at multiple scales. 

 

Title:               Measuring Ecosystem Restoration Benefits for Fish Passage/Dam Removal Projects – Review of Existing Projects

Presenter:       Jodi Staebell, Rock Island District

 

Key factors in quantifying ecosystem restoration benefits for fish passage/dam removal projects include: (1) quantity of habitat with restored connectivity, (2) quality of habitat upstream of the dam, (3) efficiency of each alternative (including no action) at passing the target species, and (4) habitat trade-offs.

 

Methods used to estimate ecosystem benefits for fish passage/dam removal projects in the Midwest and northeast were evaluated.  Projects were compared and contrasted based on the four factors above.  Quality of reconnected stream habitat can be measured using habitat suitability indices for target species, the Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index, biotic indices, or best professional judgment.  Benefit evaluations should consider differences in passage efficiency among the no action, fishway, fish bypass channel and dam removal alternatives.  Various strategies were used to estimate passage efficiency.  The loss of wetland and lake habitat resulting from dam removal alternatives was quantified. Use of net benefits (riverine habitat benefits – wetland/lake habitat losses) to conduct cost effectiveness-incremental cost analyses (CE-ICA) could bias results against selection of the dam removal as a recommended plan.  Trade-off analysis may best be conducted outside of CE-ICA.

 

 


SESSION VI

TIME: Thursday May 11, 10:30-12:00

ROOM: California West

TRACK: Ecosystem Restoration

TOPIC: Models and Tools:  Results

MODERATOR:

 

PRESENTATIONS:

 

Title:               Applying the Ecosystem Functions Model (HEC-EFM) at McCarran Ranch, Nevada

Presenters:     John Hickey, IWR-HEC; Jason Needham, IWR-HEC

 

McCarran Ranch is a property of The Nature Conservancy, which includes 305 acres along the Truckee River, about 15 miles east of Reno, Nevada.  In 1962, the channel at McCarran Ranch was straightened to limit flood damage, but because of this straightening, the channel has entrenched downward, partially disconnecting the stream and natural floodplain and stressing riparian vegetation.  In 2003, The Nature Conservancy began a restoration project to reverse these effects by adding meander and grade control to that stretch of the Truckee. 

 

An application of the Ecosystem Functions Model (HEC-EFM) for McCarran Ranch was developed by the Hydrologic Engineering Center (HEC) in collaboration with the Desert Research Institute.  HEC-EFM is a planning tool that helps analyze ecosystem response to changes in flow regime.

 

Two HEC-EFM relationships (cottonwoods and mayflies) were developed and tested for pre- and post-restoration conditions.  Analysis consisted of using EFM to identify important flows and stages for the cottonwoods and mayflies, using HEC-RAS (River Analysis System) and GeoRAS to produce maps of those flows, and finally, using GIS to illustrate and quantify the effects of channel restoration.

 

Results indicate that cottonwood and mayfly habitat will be reduced by the channel modifications made to the Truckee River at McCarran Ranch.  This presentation details the study and introduces new features available in HEC-EFM. 

 

Title:               Planning and Analysis for the Middle Rio Grande Bosque Ecosystem Restoration Feasibility Study

Presenters:     Lynette M. Giesen, Albuquerque District; Kelly A. Burks-Copes, ERDC

 

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Albuquerque District, working in a truly collaborative setting, has developed ecosystem restoration concepts and potential educational and recreational enhancements for the Rio Grande river corridor as it winds through Bernalillo County and the City of Albuquerque, New Mexico. The goal of the program is to develop a framework to restore the bosque (the cottonwood riparian woodland within the floodplain) into a more functional and sustainable ecosystem. Critical elements of the project will be to increase the diversity and quality of wildlife habitat by creating a vegetation mosaic, reduce the fire hazard in much of the bosque through the removal of the metal jetty jacks, debris, and the dense thickets of non-native vegetation.

 

In order to fully analyze the existing conditions and develop viable alternatives, the Albuquerque District enlisted the expertise of the Engineer Research and Development Center’s Environmental Laboratory (ERDC/EL).  Working with our stakeholders, a Habitat Evaluation and Assessment Tool (HEAT) was developed for the study area.  The HEAT techniques utilized to date include: development of a multi-disciplinary evaluation team (E-Team); collaborative development of a Multiple Formula Model; development and implementation of field assessment sampling procedures; calculation of baseline conditions and formulation of alternatives. 

 

Title:               Clear Creek Watershed Flood Damage Reduction and Ecosystem Restoration Study

Presenters:     Seth Jones, Galveston District; Robert Heinly, Galveston District; Antisa C. Webb, ERDC; Kelly A. Burks-Copes, ERDC

 

The Clear Creek watershed is approximately 47 miles long and extends from the Galveston Bay area inland to the southwest suburbs of Houston, Texas.  The Galveston District is conducting a re-evaluation study for flood damage reduction while addressing ecosystem restoration opportunities on Clear Creek and six of its tributaries.  Co-sponsors include Harris County Flood Control District, Galveston County, and Brazoria Drainage District No. 4. The District is partnering with the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Environmental Laboratory (ERDC), state and federal environmental resource agencies, and the local sponsors, to ensure all stakeholder issues are addressed.  With ERDC’s support, the District is developing three community-based Habitat Suitability Index models to evaluate changes to the aquatic and terrestrial system resulting from project implementation using the Habitat Evaluation Procedures (HEP).  This presentation describes approaches and rationales for addressing multipurpose planning for flood damage reduction and ecosystem restoration, the benefits and challenges of inter-agency planning efforts, and the methods and models used to provide qualitative and quantitative information on project benefits.  The project will serve as a case study for the community-based habitat assessment approach for a HEP application in an ecosystem context, demonstrating the effectiveness and power of these models in evaluating ecosystem restoration success.

 

Title:               Restoration of Island Habitat though the Beneficial Use of Dredged Material: A Community Approach

Presenters:     Amy Guise, Baltimore District; Angela Sowers, Baltimore District; Stacey Blersch, Baltimore District;  Denny Klosterman, Baltimore District.

 

The Mid-Chesapeake Bay Island Environmental Restoration feasibility study is focused on restoring island habitat to provide hundreds of acres of wetland and upland habitat for fish and wildlife through the beneficial use of dredged material. 

 

The study addresses two issues: (1) island habitat loss in the middle Chesapeake Bay due to land subsidence, rising sea level, and wave action, and (2) a shortfall of dredged material placement volume over the next 20 years.

 

Islands and their surrounding waters provide particularly diverse habitats that are preferentially selected by many migratory birds, as well as other fish and wildlife species.  Even though similar vegetative communities may occur on the mainland, isolation, lack of human disturbance, and fewer predators make islands more attractive.

 

Environmental benefits were quantified using Island Community Units (ICUs), a metric developed for the study that focuses on the functional communities that inhabit islands.  ICUs  capture the value of island habitat diversity and the benefits to the various communities in order to evaluate proposed island alignments and habitat distributions.  Habitats evaluated include areas for submerged aquatic vegetation or shallow water, intertidal, low marsh, high marsh, and uplands, as well as various upland to wetland ratios.